Philosophy: Difference between revisions
add Rousseau & Hobbes |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Indian = | |||
Adi Shankaracharya | * Adi Shankaracharya | ||
* Adi Romanujacharya | |||
* Adi Madhuacharya | |||
= Chinese = | |||
* Lao Tzu | |||
* Confucius | |||
* Mencius | |||
= European = | |||
== Dutch == | |||
* Baruch Spinoza | |||
== French == | |||
* René Descartes | * René Descartes | ||
| Line 27: | Line 25: | ||
** believed that people are naturally good, therefore nature is basically good; culture is what corrupted people | ** believed that people are naturally good, therefore nature is basically good; culture is what corrupted people | ||
== English == | |||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Thomas Hobbes] | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Thomas Hobbes] | ||
** Conservative philosopher, relatively to Rousseau when it came to anthropology | ** Conservative philosopher, relatively to Rousseau when it came to anthropology | ||
** believed that in the state of nature, every person is at another person's throat; only thing that prevented this murderous intent was the imposition of a collective agreement (aka social contract) that would govern how people would interact | ** believed that in the state of nature, every person is at another person's throat; only thing that prevented this murderous intent was the imposition of a collective agreement (aka social contract) that would govern how people would interact | ||
Revision as of 09:44, 23 July 2020
Indian
- Adi Shankaracharya
- Adi Romanujacharya
- Adi Madhuacharya
Chinese
- Lao Tzu
- Confucius
- Mencius
European
Dutch
- Baruch Spinoza
French
- René Descartes
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau
- believed that people are naturally good, therefore nature is basically good; culture is what corrupted people
English
- Thomas Hobbes
- Conservative philosopher, relatively to Rousseau when it came to anthropology
- believed that in the state of nature, every person is at another person's throat; only thing that prevented this murderous intent was the imposition of a collective agreement (aka social contract) that would govern how people would interact